| |
농동법에 관한건데 정말 이해가 잘 안돼네여....영어 잘하시는 고수님께 부탁 드림니다.. 해석좀 해주세요,,,꾸뻑
First, many dangers, such as falls from roofs or amputations from unguarded machinery, were widely recognized when the OSHA Act was adopted in 1970 and should have been eliminated years ago. Simple means of correcting some of these hazards have actually been well understood for more than two thousand years, as Herodotus described the prevention of fatal trench collapses on his history of the Persian Wares.
Second, today's workers face hazards present in 1970 but not fully appreciated by those who wrote the OSH Act, like the forceful exertions, repetitive movements and awkward postures that can cause the work-related musculoskeletal disorders which account for more than 30% of all worker compensation claims and affect workers in virtually every industry and occupation. Other examples include workplace violence and biohazards.
Third are genuinely new hazards that have entered the workplace since 1970 such as diacetyl and other food flavorings that cause bronchiolitis obliterans (popcorn lung) or modern metalworking fluids that cause hypersensitivity pneumonitis.
Fourth, changes in the political, economic, and legal landscape of work since 1970 have brought new safety and health challenges. Globalized businesses, downsized manufacturing, increased outsourcing, reduced pension security, erosion of labor laws, an aging workforce, declining unionization, and growing numbers of recent immigrant workers have altered the nature and experience of work.
[simple] 전체를 일일이 번역해 드리기는 좀 그렇고요,
노동현장에서의 여러가지 상해 위험 요소들을 네 가지로 나누어 이야기하고 있군요..
첫째와 둘째는 OSHA 규정에 의해 인정되는 상해와 인정되지 않는 상해들,
셋째는 음식이나 중금속 중독 등에 의한 폐질환 등의 상해, 그리고
네번 째는 정치, 경제, 법령 등의 변화에 따른 노동환경의 변화에 따라 새로운 위험요소들이 있다는
이야기를 하고 있습니다.
|
|
5/26/2012 |
|
|
SimpleTouch Design